We Spoke to His Wife: The Biarritz Owner’s Justification for Recruiting Mohamed Haouas

The owner of Biarritz justifies the recruitment of Mohamed Haouas by emphasizing the notion of forgiveness and stating that they spoke to his wife before making the decision. The owner believes that forgiveness is an important concept and that they took the time to communicate with Haouas’ wife, who expressed gratitude for giving them a chance. This suggests that the owner considered the personal circumstances and sought input from Haouas’ family before making the recruitment decision.

Mohamed Haouas is a French rugby player who has been involved in a controversy surrounding his recruitment. Here is some information about him and why his recruitment has been controversial:
Conviction for domestic violence: Haouas was convicted of domestic violence and sentenced to one year in jail.

This criminal conviction raised concerns about his character and behavior.Missed Rugby World Cup: Due to his jail sentence, Haouas was unable to participate in the Rugby World Cup in France. This further added to the controversy surrounding his recruitment.
Forgiveness and personal circumstances: The owner of Biarritz, the rugby club that recruited Haouas, justified the decision by emphasizing the notion of forgiveness and stating that they spoke to his wife before making the decision.

The owner believed in giving Haouas a second chance and took into account his personal circumstances.
Opposition and criticism: The recruitment of Haouas has faced opposition and criticism from various individuals and entities. The mayor of Biarritz expressed shock and dissociated herself from the recruitment, considering it an insult to their values.

The controversial nature of Haouas‘ past actions has led to public outcry and disagreement over his inclusion in the team.
In summary, Mohamed Haouas is a French rugby player whose recruitment has been controversial due to his conviction for domestic violence, his missed participation in the Rugby World Cup, and the differing opinions regarding forgiveness and second chances.